Printable student rubric

AI Governance Scorecard

Score one specific AI use—not AI in general. A number is only as strong as the evidence behind it.

Back to tools

Define one specific use

Score what the evidence shows

0 = unacceptable or no evidence · 1 = major weakness · 2 = acceptable with conditions · 3 = strong public value. The downloadable rubric describes every score in every dimension.

1. Human learning

Does the use strengthen thinking, creation, judgment, and productive struggle rather than substitute for them?

2. Human relationships

Does it preserve or deepen meaningful relationships among students, educators, families, and communities?

3. Privacy and safety

Is data minimized, protected, understandable, and governed with meaningful consent and recourse?

4. Equity and access

Does it reduce rather than reproduce disparities in access, disability support, language, discipline, and opportunity?

5. Student and educator agency

Can users understand, question, refuse, appeal, and help shape the system?

6. Ownership and economic value

Who owns the data, model, intellectual property, and value? Does the arrangement build public or community capability?

7. Accountability and reversibility

Are responsibility, monitoring, independent review, redress, and an exit path clear?

8. Public value

Is the use solving a demonstrated educational problem at a defensible cost, including opportunity cost?

Do not let the total make the decision

0 of 8 dimensions scored · Total: 0 / 24